Malathion has been sprayed on millions of innocent people even though the EPA has known since 1986 something is wrong

 ...studies under agency review also showed malathion produced "significant" tumors in mice, according to EPA memos. The pesticide and its chemical cousins - used in homes and schools and on lawns and food crops - act on the central nervous system.

 [ Review Comments ]

[ Visit WWW Board on Aerial Spraying ]

[ Pesticide Poisoning and Kids ] * [ Symptoms of Pesticide Poisoning ]
[ MEMORIAL TO VICTIMS ]


[ Previous correspondence ]        [ Go to Full List of emails ]      [ Next Correspondence ]


Subject:   California "Health Officials" Move to "Protect" Continued Malathion Use-
Date:       Mon, 27 Mar 2000 07:44:30 -0500
From:        Stephen Tvedten <steve@getipm.com>
Organization:     Get Set Inc. (www.getipm.com)

To:     Lyndon Hawkins <hawkins@empm.cdpr.ca.gov>
          Senior Research Scientist
          State of California, Department of Pesticide Regulation - Integrated Pest Management

Dear Lyndon, I thought you might be interested in an e-mail I just received from Joyce Shepard. The reclassification of malathion has been going on since 1986. I think we have to start putting on more pressure. The article that follows is  from the Monday, February 2, 1998, issue of the Tampa Tribune, Tampa, Florida.

 Urban application of malathion questionable - JAN HOLLINGSWORTH

 TAMPA - New health concerns and more stringent federal rules jeopardize the future use of malathion in urban areas. Agriculture officials didn't require an act of Congress to declare aerial war on the Mediterranean fruit fly last summer. But they did need a special federal permit to spray 31,000 gallons of malathion over 400 square miles of urban landscape. That permit was already in place. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has renewed it every three years for two decades. In November 1997, it expired.  Whether malathion will return to the fly fighters' arsenal for future wars is uncertain in the face of mounting public opposition, new health concerns and more stringent pesticide regulations. "It's not a foregone conclusion that this [permit] will be reissued by any means," said James Jones, director of EPA's registration division.

Among the major stumbling blocks:

The pesticide is used on more than 140 food crops. EPA moved to revoke its use on some 50 of those crops in July, saying research does not support application in those cases. Malathion's manufacturer, Cheminova, has appealed most of the proposed revocations. The pesticide's status as a possible cancer-causing agent - long the subject of EPA scrutiny - may be resolved in the coming weeks, said Jones. A 1978 study by the National Cancer Institute that indicated the pesticide produced tumors in laboratory mice was deemed flawed and inconclusive. But two subsequent studies under agency review also showed malathion produced "significant" tumors in mice, according to EPA memos. The pesticide and its chemical cousins - used in homes and schools and on lawns and food crops - act on the central nervous system. The 1996 Food Quality Protection Act requires the EPA to consider the cumulative effect of exposure from all these sources. "It's a significant change in the way the agency has been doing business," Johnson said. Last summer's Medfly eradication campaign, which blanketed most of Hillsborough and portions of Polk, Orange, Manatee and Sarasota counties with malathion, was based on a 1991 risk assessment that took into account only the estimated 2.8 ounces per acre dispensed by fly fighters' helicopters and DC-3s.

Even so, the California health officials who prepared the risk assessment recommended "that the aerial application of malathion bait in urban areas to eradicate agricultural pests be reconsidered." Because malathion is not approved for this use, agriculture officials relied on a 25-year-old law that allows the EPA to grant emergency permits to control pests that present a threat to public health, the environment or - in the case of the Medfly - the economy. "No one ever envisioned that this [permit] would be used to spray pesticides over residential areas as justification for protecting an agricultural crop," said Jay Feldman of the National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides. Nor was continuous renewal of emergency permits supposed to serve as a loophole for the indefinite use of a pesticide in a manner for which it has not been approved, he said. "The whole point of not allowing more than three years is that the permitting process is not the equivalent of a regulatory review of human health and safety issues," said Feldman.

In December, EPA officials asked the U.S. Department of Agriculture to withdraw its application to renew the emergency permit, suggesting the Medfly program relied too heavily on chemical remedies. "My staff and I are ready to work with you to ensure that any new request can be developed in a manner that is consistent with EPA's legal obligation to protect the public and the environment from unreasonable adverse effects posed by pesticides," wrote Jones in a Dec. 18 letter to agriculture officials.

Malathion opponents have inundated both agencies with requests that nontoxic alternatives - such as the release of sterile Medflies - replace malathion as the agriculture department's weapon of choice. "The permit is not supposed to be granted if feasible alternatives are available and we believe sterile release is a feasible alternative," said Susan McMillan, a member of a Sarasota-based opposition group. Agriculture officials say sterile flies alone do not deliver the swift knockout punch needed to protect agricultural interests. "Malathion is the one tool that will kill 100 percent of the Medflies," said Teung Chin, who is preparing the agriculture department's application to renew the permit. Nonetheless, the agency expects to submit a significantly revised emergency permit renewal request in March. "We are aggressively looking to fine-tune it," said Chin.

In 1997, Tampa Bay area residents lived with swarms of planes and helicopters overhead spraying malathion to kill Mediterranean fruit flies in a battle to save citrus and other susceptible crops. Controversy arose and the spray program's future is now uncertain.

A Timeline:

AI: Jan Hollingsworth reports on environmental issues. She can be reached at (813) 259-7607. IT: (C) A DC-3 sprays malathion during a Medfly campaign in June involving Hillsborough, Polk and Orange counties.

  Well Lyndon, the data that proves your "registered" POISONS are not truly registered or worth the RISK - keeps on coming - when will it be "legal" (in your opinion) to use safe and far more effective alternatives to control pest problems in California?

Respectfully,  Stephen L. Tvedten


(Editor's Note: Who are they really targeting?  The pest or the People? Who gets rich from this... agrochemical companies, a few rich growers and as a side effect the health care workers tending the injured.

Please!

TOP
 If you would like to be included in our mailing list for continuing information on pesticides, please email us .

Nontoxic Products Recommended by Steve Tvedten

Now Available

Safe 2 Use Products and Services