USDA to Withdraw 1998 FIFRA Application for Medfly Malathion Spraying in Florida

 

Click Here to Add Comment

 

Subject:   Malathion Use Withdrawn----
Date:        Thu, 24 Aug 2000 19:59:50 -0400
From:        Stephen Tvedten <steve@getipm.com>
Organization:     Get Set Inc. (www.getipm.com)

To:     Paul Helliker <phelliker@cdpr.ca.gov>
          Director, State of California, Department of Pesticide Regulation 

Dear Mr. Helliker, I thought you might like to read an article entitled: USDA to Withdraw 1998 FIFRA Application for Medfly Malathion Spraying in Florida - Daily Environmental Report, ppAA-1-2 - dated January 8, 1998. The url is: http://www.pmac.net/medfly.htm 

The US Department of Agriculture will be withdrawing its application for aerial spraying of pesticides for 1998 at the request of EPA. The application was essentially a duplicate of the application filed in 1997 that allowed the agency to spray malathion to kill infestations of Medflies in Florida.

A USDA spokesman, Nolan Lemon, said that the agency plans to revise and resubmit the application under Section 18 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act.

In 1997 USDA received an exemption that allowed it to spray malathion over infested crops in Hillsborough County, Florida. The spraying was highly controversial, and citizen groups protested that the campaign killed beneficial insects and posed significant risks to human health and the environment.

Although the Medfly infestations were eradicated, USDA submitted an application for 1998 to allow for a fast response to any future infestations.

James J. Jones, director of the Registration Division of EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs, sent a letter to USDA on Dec. 18, 1997, asking the agency to withdraw and revise its application.

"EPA believes it is necessary to redesign the existing exotic fruit fly quarantine regime so that the organophosphate pesticides malathion and diazinon are not utilized so prominently," Jones said in the letter. Jones continued by saying that USDA should also address concerns that were raised during a meeting with the public in Tampa on December 2, 1997.

Denise Kearns, an EPA spokeswoman, said that EPA hopes to see a more comprehensive plan for eradicating future infestations in Florida, such as the plan that has been used successfully in California.

"What we'd like to see is the state of Florida and the USDA come up with a plan that would meet some of the [public's] concerns," said Kearns. "The application had malathion as the prime method of combat, and we'd like to see more of a comprehensive program that would include early detection and less intrusive means to kill the Medfly."

Well Mr. Helliker, many unregistered alternatives are safe, far more effective and far less "intrusive" - but, the real point is the EPA is attacking anyone who comes up with any alternative and demanding they cease and desist and pay exorbitant fines for daring to solve pest problems without using any of your "registered" POISONS. I hope that one day this will change, but, until then I once again say "Come and arrest me."

Respectfully, Stephen L. Tvedten

TOP
 If you would like to be included in our mailing list for continuing information on pesticides, please email us at list@safe2use.com with "subscribe" in the subject line.