Kids' Health Is No Experiment
The industry's argument in favor of the Pombo bill boils down to the assertion that pesticides should be held innocent until unquestionably proven guilty. The smart course is "better safe than sorry" when it comes to children's health. The Pombo bill should be defeated.

Click Here to Add Comment

 

Subject:  Kids' Health Is No Experiment------
Date:     Sat, 09 Sep 2000 14:33:21 -0400
From:        Stephen Tvedten <steve@getipm.com>
Organization:     Get Set Inc. (www.getipm.com)

To:     Paul Helliker <phelliker@cdpr.ca.gov>
          Director, State of California, Department of Pesticide Regulation 

Dear Mr. Helliker,  I thought you might like to read an article entitled: Kids' Health Is No Experiment - LA TIMES - Wed. Sept 6, 2000.

   In 1993, the National Academy of Sciences issued a seminal study of federal pesticide standards, criticizing their failure to account for the greater vulnerability of children to low-level exposure. The study resulted in the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, which requires the Environmental Protection Agency to determine safe levels of pesticide residues for children. The law was seen as a compromise between environmentalists--who wanted a total ban on old, relatively toxic pesticides--and farmers who said a ban would put them out of business.  Since its enactment, however, the act has only widened the rift between agribusiness and food safety experts.

   Food safety experts criticize the EPA for its failure to live up to its promise of fast action on the riskiest of the 9,700 pesticides on which the act required a review--particularly a group of nerve agents called organophosphates. Those experts point out that the only regulations the EPA has imposed so far are restrictions on how three types of particularly dangerous organophosphates may be used.

   Meanwhile, farmers and pesticide manufacturers accuse the agency of implementing the act too quickly. This week they are lobbying for a bill, HR 1592, by Rep. Richard W. Pombo (R-Tracy), that would make it next to impossible for the agency to implement a key provision of the food protection act. The bill is scheduled for a vote Thursday in the House Agriculture Committee.

   Pombo says his bill "does not change any of the new and more rigorous [Food Quality Protection Act] safety standards and simply establishes a fair process." In fact, the bill would turn the 1996 law on its head.

   The act holds that unless the EPA has reliable evidence showing that a given pesticide is safe for children, the agency must err on the side of caution and use stricter standards to ensure that children are protected from exposure to that pesticide. The Pombo bill reverses that provision, prohibiting the EPA from acting against a pesticide unless the scientific evidence of harm is certain and overwhelming. That is just not the way science works.

   Agribusiness is, however, right in saying that the act is somewhat arbitrary in calling for a tenfold reduction of pesticide residues in foods that children are likely to eat, including fresh fruits and vegetables. Vice President Al Gore was right in 1998 when, to the dismay of environmentalists and some food safety experts, he asked that the EPA work more closely with agribusiness before implementing any provision of the act. However, it is one thing to implement the law cautiously and another thing entirely to gut its key provision.

   The industry's argument in favor of the Pombo bill boils down to the assertion that pesticides should be held innocent until unquestionably proven guilty. The smart course is "better safe than sorry" when it comes to children's health. The Pombo bill should be defeated.

* * *

   To Take Action: House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) has the power to block the bill. (202) 225-2976. E-mail: dhastert@mail.house.gov

 Well Mr. Helliker, Someday you will have to admit your decision demanding the total reliance on your "registered" POISONS to "control" pest problems was and is not only dangerous but totally ineffective.  The real joke is we survived and prospered without these "registered" POISONS and have used safe and far more effective alternatives for millennia.   As you can clearly see more and more people are coming to that understanding.

I will not make the mistake of stopping these e-mails until you allow the use of safe and far more effective alternatives, for as William Blake (1757 - 1827) once said:  "There is no mistake so great as the mistake of not going on."

TOP
 If you would like to be included in our mailing list for continuing information on pesticides, please email us at list@safe2use.com with "subscribe" in the subject line.