Spraying airplanes for bugs

Spraying airplanes for bugs -- while passengers are aboard -- is required by six countries and allowed by at least six others as a way to kill unwanted species of insects that could harm plants or animals. 

[ Related Story ]

Click Here to Add Comment

 


            


Subject:   Insecticides Debate Buzzes---
Date:       Sun, 05 Nov 2000 10:44:34 -0500
From:        Stephen Tvedten <steve@getipm.com>
Organization:     Get Set Inc. (www.getipm.com)

To:     Paul Helliker <phelliker@cdpr.ca.gov>
          Director, State of California, Department of Pesticide Regulation 

Dear Mr. Helliker,  I thought you might like to read an article >From USA TODAY, dated 10/06/00, entitled: Insecticides debate buzzes By Dennis Blank, Special for USA TODAY.

When you see flight attendants spraying a plane's cabin shortly before landing in a foreign country, it's a safe bet they're not using air freshener. Try insecticide.

Spraying airplanes for bugs -- while passengers are aboard -- is required by six countries and allowed by at least six others as a way to kill unwanted species of insects that could harm plants or animals.

On-board pesticide spraying -- a controversial practice for years -- is under debate again because of two recent lawsuits by flight attendant groups and an outcry from citizen groups. Opponents say some sprays contain carcinogens and that exposure can cause nausea, fatigue and numbness in humans.

"Our contention is they should not use these products in all airplanes," says Linda Laurent, a Houston lawyer who has filed a class-action lawsuit in Louisiana and another one on behalf of 350 flight attendants in Los Angeles. "Repeated chronic doses are not safe."

Don't expect airlines to warn you what flights will be sprayed, though. A year ago, the Department of Transportation (DOT) dropped a proposal to require airlines and travel agents to inform customers when they buy their tickets if their destination requires spraying. The DOT said at the time the rule wasn't needed because 20 countries had discontinued the required spraying of all arriving flights and only two still mandated spraying when passengers were aboard.

But the DOT's Web site indicates the practice is more widespread. As of Dec. 1, the site says, Grenada, India, Kiribati, Trinidad and Tobago, Madagascar and Uruguay required spraying of inbound flights with aerosol sprays while passengers are on board. Six other countries -- Australia, Barbados, Fiji, Jamaica, New Zealand and Panama -- require spraying of all inbound flights but allow airlines to choose among three methods. Airlines can use an aerosol while passengers are on board or not, or apply a long-lasting insecticide in unoccupied cabins. If they use the third method, a residue remains on seats and other surfaces.

Airline industry officials say there's nothing to worry about.

"We don't think there is any danger to passengers who get on an airplane," says United Airlines spokesman Joe Hopkins.

The Air Transport Association, the airlines' trade group, continues to oppose any government mandate to tell passengers about countries' spraying rules, ATA lawyer David Berg says. Most airlines will disclose the practice if asked.

According to the DOT Web site, the World Health Organization has said that aircraft "disinsection" does not present a risk to human health "if performed appropriately." However, the report also noted that some people may experience temporary discomfort associated with aerosol insecticides.

Michael Miller of Los Angeles did. He says he suffered partial numbness in his fingers and toes and slight speech impairment up to a month after a flight to New Zealand that was sprayed. Tests revealed he had high amounts of a carcinogenic substance traced to a product sprayed in the cabin.

One of the most commonly used products is made by Airosol of Neodesha, Kan., one of six companies named in a lawsuit by flight attendants. One of the flight attendants' lawsuits contends that attendants have been "exposed to hazardous levels of these insecticides" made by Airosol, as well as those manufactured by Sumitomo Chemical America, McLaughlin Gormley King , Glaxo Wellcome, Burroughs Wellcome Foundation and Hoechst and Schering. Lawyers for Airosol and Sumitomo have denied allegations in formal responses to the lawsuit but did not return telephone calls from USA TODAY.

Gary Ordog, a physician and toxicologist in Valencia, Calif., said he is treating 10 United flight attendants who suffer from symptoms including chronic fatigue, headaches, rashes and memory loss. One is permanently disabled.

Spraying is also an issue in the USA, although U.S. airlines stopped spraying airliner cabins with passengers on board in the late 1970s. So-called residual spraying of unoccupied cabins and cargo areas is common. More than 1,000 jets a month in the USA are being treated with insecticides during overnight maintenance stops.

Terminex said it treats 1,000 to 1,500 aircraft a month in Atlanta, San Francisco and Chicago. It has contracts with several airlines: Delta, United, American, Hawaii Air, American Trans Air, Continental, Southwest and AirTran. More than a dozen products approved by the EPA for use on airlines are identified as being harmful to humans.

http://www.usatoday.org/life/travel/business/1999/t0316bt4.htm

"If having endured much, we at last asserted our 'right to know' and if, knowing, we have concluded that we are being asked to take senseless and frightening risks, then we should no longer accept the counsel of those who tell us that we must fill our world with poisonous chemicals, we should look around and see what other course is open to us."   Rachel Carson

Well Mr. Helliker, When will you look around and see what other course is open for us?

Respectfully,  Stephen L. Tvedten

Powered by
Safe2Use Nontoxic Products and Services

TOP
 If you would like to be included in our mailing list for continuing information on pesticides, please email us at list@safe2use.com with "subscribe" in the subject line.