Questions have been asked of the California Department of Pesticide Control since Fontana Unified School District declined to consider a pesticide free IPM program because of the Department of Agriculture's opinion about only utilizing registered pesticides to eliminate pests.
Subject:
Re: Immunotoxic Effects of Dursban, etc.
Date:
Thu, 04 Feb 1999 09:28:32 -0500
Organization: Get Set Inc.
To:
Lyndon Hawkins <hawkins@empm.cdpr.ca.gov>
CC:
"Marion Moses, M.D." <pec@pesticides.org>,
"Doris J. Rapp, M.D." <drrappmd@aol.com>,
Jay Feldman <ncamp@igc.apc.org>,
Will Snodgrass <lookusup@bigsky.net>,
CHEC <chec@checnet.org>,
Robert McClintock <rmcclintock@northmont.k12.oh.us>,
Cynthia Stoddard Fitzgerald <cfitzge562@aol.com>,
Tom Alsup <info@ginesis.com>,
Norma Grier <info@pesticide.org>,
Linda Jensen-Pascarella <info@safe2use.com>,
"Robert K. Simon, Ph.D." <ETIRKS@aol.com>,
"Robert L. Laing" <"71674,1365"@compuserve.com>,
"Claire W. Gilbert" <blazingt@concentric.net>,
Donnelly Hadden <dwhadden@umich.edu>,
"Eric W. Acosta" <EBugs@aol.com>,
Dear Mr. Hawkins:
I have "enclosed" an article on cancer caused by industrial solvents - industrial solvents (as you well know) are included in "registered" pesticide poisons, but these "inerts" are not even listed on the label, the MSDS or considered in the "risk formula". Many of these "inerts" (all of which are totally ignored in "registered" pesticide poisons) have an MSDS that prohibits their use around people, but put a "registered" poison active ingredient in and they bureaucratically/magically become 'safe" enough to spray inside our homes, schools and offices. Please do not try to "hide" behind bureaucratic definitions. There are people dying and becoming ill in California because of bureaucratic definitions and lack of concern. I know the definition of "registered" pesticides.
My only point in writing you repeatedly was to point out there are many ways to control pests more effectively and far more safely than the use of "registered" pesticide poisons. In 1993 the EPA, FDA and Department of Agriculture all agreed to look for alternatives to "registered" pesticide poisons. San Francisco has elected to use some of these alternatives. When we tried to protect the children in several school districts in California, we were told by Mr. Mitchel of your Department that it was illegal to use any pest control alternatives in California. I have repeatedly asked you, "Is it really illegal to wash your can in California?" A single dirty garbage can can produce 1000 flies and 2000 maggots each week in California. If you wash this can, the soap and water will kill the flies and maggots. Is it really illegal to control flies in California with soap and water by your interpretation of the law? Until you answer this question, and allow the use of alternatives in California, you personally are ensuring the continued contamination of the State of California and its people with these "registered" poisons that do not control pests.
I have many ways to solve the fire ant problem in Orange County and elsewhere through the State, none of which requires the use of "registered" poisons. The federal government and every department of agriculture in every fire ant infested state have been totally useless in controlling fire ants with "registered" poisons. Tens of thousands of chemicals/poisons have been tested, hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent and every year 20% more of the United States is infested with fire ants. My chapter on how to control fire ants with several safe alternatives that actually control fire ants will shortly be put up on the internet.
Mr. Hawkins, it is a sad thing in this Country to find bureaucrats more interested in protecting the profits of poison companies and their bureaucratic jobs rather than the health and welfare of the people. Obviously, it is no longer the government of the people, by the people and for the people. The Nuremburg trials clearly showed that "following orders" was not an excuse for one's own culpability. As I have said before, people and pets will continue to sicken and die in California and some pest control applicators will have pulled the "registered" trigger, but you, Mr. Hawkins, will have aimed the gun.
Foregoing is a response to this email:
Lyndon Hawkins wrote:
Lyndon Hawkins: Is it still illegal in California to wash
your can? If
so, please comment on the enclosed 3 brief articles and why
you still
insist only "registered" poisons must be used to "control" pest
problems
in California.
Apparently you did not understand my comments about pesticide
registration and use. Refer to the websites for California
law and
FIFRA regarding pesticides (registration and use) so you can
read the
requirements. Please note the definition of pesticide.
http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/fac/fac.htm
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/regleg.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lyndon Hawkins <hawkins@empm.cdpr.ca.gov>
Department of Pesticide Regulation
Lyndon Hawkins
Department of Pesticide Regulation <hawkins@empm.cdpr.ca.gov>
830 K St.
Work: 916-324-4254
Room 200
Fax: 916-324-4088
Sacramento
Netscape Conference Address
CA
95814
Additional Information:
Last Name Hawkins
First Name Lyndon
Version 2.1
ARTICLE INCLUDED IN EMAIL TO LYNDON HAWKINS
Living Life in a
Cancer Cluster
Parents and Children
Looking for Answers
Michael Gillick, age 20, with his mom,
Linda Gillick. Michael stands 38 inches
high, no taller than the average
4-year-old, one of the effects of
neuroblastoma, a cancer of the nervous
system. (LaCoppola-Meier)
By Buck Wolf
ABCNEWS.com
T O M S R I V E R, N. J. — Michael Gillick scares
some children. And he inspires others.
Cancer has ravaged the 20-year-old Toms River, N.J.,
resident. Tumors cover his body, enveloping many of his
organs, even his optic nerve. One eye barely opens. He
stands 38 inches high. And when little kids see him, he
sometimes hears them say, "Run, run, it’s a monster."
Yet Gillick struggles to live, largely to help childhood
cancer victims. "Anyone can see I have a severe cancer
condition," he says. "If I can get through to a little kid with
cancer and let him know it’s good to be alive, that means
something."
Lucky to Be Alive
Gillick has been battling neuroblastoma, a cancer of the
nervous system, since the earliest months of his life.
Doctors told his parents he’d be lucky to reach his first
birthday. Twice, he came close enough to death for a priest
to read him the last rites. Yet this month he celebrated his
20th birthday.
"I know I’m living for a reason. Maybe sometimes the
doctors didn’t know that."
The Gillicks are one of some 60 families in the Toms
River area who believe that two local companies polluted
their water supply with industrial solvents that caused
cancer among the children
For more than two years, federal and state scientists
have been studying this section of Dover Township after
data from the state cancer registry revealed that cancer
was diagnosed in 24 Toms River residents younger than 19
between 1979 and 1995 — 10 more than statistically
expected.
In Dover Township, 90 children contracted cancer in the
same time period. According to statistical averages, health
officials had expected to find 67 cases among the area’s
11,000 children.
"As we were running in and out of hospitals, we didn’t
know for years that so many people in our community
faced the same sorts of problems," says Linda Gillick,
Michael’s mother and a former teacher who now works as
co-founder of Ocean of Love, a nonprofit support group
for cancer sufferers and their families.
"Then we found out," she says. "And we have to look
to each other for support."
In November 1996, scientists discovered small levels of
styrene-acrylonitrile trimer, a byproduct from plastic
manufacturing that might be a carcinogen, in water from
area wells. The families and some environmentalists pointed
to two local manufacturers — Union Carbide and Ciba
Geigy — which deny any wrongdoing.
But instead of suing, some 60 families have entered into
an agreement with the companies and the local water utility,
with the help of various government regulators. The two
sides meet regularly, albeit warily, exchanging information
and trying to reach some kind of arrangement that satisfies
everyone without the tremendous costs and animosity of a
court battle.
Something to Crow About
Despite the horrors of childhood cancer, Toms River has a
lot to crow about. Thousands of tourists flock to the
nearby sandy beaches each year. New businesses and
industry are omnipresent. And the town reveled last year in
winning the Little League World Series.
"When we had our victory parade, a lot of people
thought that the kids with cancer should be up there with
the Little Leaguers," says Lori Cardini, whose 11-year-old
daughter Jessica suffers from leukemia. "Because in a
sense, they are the real heroes."
After celebrating his birthday, Michael Gillick considers
the rest of his life borrowed time. "They said I’d never
make it to adulthood, so I figured if I made it to 20 I’d be
proving them wrong," he says. "It’s very sweet to kiss my
teen-age years goodbye."
Bad days come and go. But Gillick has done his best to
approximate normal life. He graduated high school through
a home study program, and served as best man at his older
brother Kevin’s wedding.
If he had no impediments, Gillick says he’d be bound
for medical school. But his illness makes it impossible to
work, drive a car, or even type for long periods at a
keyboard. "I don’t dwell too much on what could have
been," he says. "That is a trap that can be worse even than
cancer."
"I never had the dating and going out that other kids
had," he says. "But I love my friends and family and I try to
help the kids around me. I know what it’s like to live with a
condition and I can help others."
Check out the accompanying slide show, etc. at:
ABCNEWS.com : Life in a Cancer Cluster
http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/tomsriverfamilies990203.html
|
Nontoxic Products Recommended by Steve Tvedten Now Available |
| Safe 2 Use Products and Services |