FUNGICIDE POLLUTION COSTS DUPONT MILLIONS

Chemical giant DuPont has been ordered to pay $12.3 million in damages to an Ecuadoran shrimp farm - the second such ruling against the company in three months.  

 


            


Subject:    FUNGICIDE POLLUTION COSTS DUPONT MILLIONS
 Date:        Mon, 5 Mar 2001 18:56:41 -0500
From:        Stephen Tvedten <steve@getipm.com>
Organization:     Get Set Inc. (www.getipm.com)

To:     Paul Helliker <phelliker@cdpr.ca.gov>
          Director, State of California, Department of Pesticide Regulation 

cc:    Christine Whitman whitman.christine@epa.gov

Dear Mr. Helliker,  I thought you might like to read an article entitled: FUNGICIDE POLLUTION COSTS DUPONT MILLIONS.

FORT LAUDERDALE, Florida, February 28, 2001 (ENS) - Chemical giant DuPont has been ordered to pay $12.3 million in damages to an Ecuadoran shrimp farm - the second such ruling against the company in three months.

A jury in Broward County ordered the multimillion penalties after lawyers argued that agricultural runoff of DuPont's fungicide Benlate had harmed shrimp production on Ecuador's shrimp farm Aquamar, reports the "South Florida Sun-Sentinel."

In December, another south Florida jury ordered DuPont to pay $10 million for damages at another Ecuadoran shrimp farm - also from Benlate runoff. DuPont is appealing that verdict, and is expected to appeal this week's decision as well.

At least 30 cases have been brought against DuPont by shrimp farms in Ecuador, the world's third largest shrimp producer. Hundreds more have been brought against the chemical company in recent years by farmers and other businesses in several companies, all related to Benlate.

Many of the Benlate cases have been tried in Florida because DuPont tested and marketed the fungicide in south Florida, and runs its Latin America and Caribbean sales division from Coral Gables, Florida.

So far, DuPont has spent more than $1 billion to settle these claims. About $200 million of that has gone to one law firm - Krupnick Campbell Malone Roselli, the Fort Lauderdale firm that represented Aquamar in the trial that ended Tuesday.

Well Mr. Helliker, just another example of the "sound science" behind your "registration" of POISONS to "protect" us and our crops!  Why must there be so much needless pain and destruction before you will allow the use of safe and far more effective alternatives to actually control pest problems?

Respectfully,  Stephen L. Tvedten

If you would like to be included in our mailing list for continuing information on pesticides, Email Us. with "subscribe" in the subject line.

TOP

Nontoxic Products Recommended by Steve Tvedten

Now Available

Safe 2 Use Products and Services