2,4-D In The News

Click Here to Add Comment

Previous Current Articles Next

        Subject:     2,4-D In The News
           
Date:     Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:40:01 -0400
          
From:     Stephen Tvedten <steve@getipm.com>
Organization:     Get Set Inc. (www.getipm.com)

To:     Paul Helliker <phelliker@cdpr.ca.gov>
          Director, State of California, Department of Pesticide Regulation 

cc:    Christine Whitman whitman.christine@epa.gov

Wednesday, July 10, 2002 - The Ottawa Citizen
Letters To The Editor - Pesticide Directions Aren't Followed
Re: Handbook clears 2,4-D, July 5.

When pesticide defenders such as the Industry Task Force II on 2,4-D  Research Data try to convince us that pesticides are harmless to humans, they use qualifying words "when used according to label  directions."

This is a crucially important phrase because virtually all labels  warn against contact with skin, eyes and lungs. And this amounts to  the necessity for all applicators, and all those within exposure  distance, to wear full face masks, chemical workers' eye goggles,  chemically impervious outer clothing and rubber gloves and  boots, according to recommendations on pesticide Material Safety Data  Sheets, and from the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and  Safety.

So when was the last time anyone saw such protective gear being worn?  Sunglasses and rubber boots are all that sprayers wear because their  employers are not required to give them full toxicological and such  protective gear information, and they wouldn't want to "alarm the public" regarding the toxicity of such products.

Even pesticide manufacturers acknowledge that such products can cause  serious damage to human health. Material safety data sheets, although  not standardized and voluntarily produced, are often very revealing  sources of information, if people can obtain them.

When I testified before the House of Commons standing committee on  environment that exposure to Par 3 can cause "nausea, vomiting and muscular weakness, and prolonged or repeated exposure may lead to  liver or kidney damage or central nervous symptoms," the source of my  information was Weed Man's data sheet on Par 3, obtained from the  manufacturers, United Agri Products.

Manufacturers and applicators will not tell us what other toxic  products they mix their pesticides with. That's confidential business information.

Peggy Land,

Gloucester
© Copyright  2002 The Ottawa Citizen

http://www.canada.com/ottawa/ottawacitizen/letters/story.asp?id={926B2540-E2B4-4001-9711-29A80ED9C979}

-------------------

July 10, 2002 - The Ottawa Citizen - Some Risks

Even if 2,4-D were used according to instructions, it still may pose  health risks. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's hazard summary (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/hlthef/di-oxyac.html) states that  there is an increased incidence of human tumour formation; chronic exposure results in effects on the blood, liver, and kidneys in  animals; and at high concentrations affects the human nervous system.  These studies are done in relation to adults and not children. The  hazard summary also states that the EPA has not classified 2,4-D as  to its human carcinogenicity.

Chris Jalkotzy
Ottawa


If you would like to be included in our mailing list for continuing information on pesticides, please email us at list@safe2use.com.

TOP


Nontoxic Products Recommended by Steve Tvedten

Now Available

Safe 2 Use Products and Services