Los Angeles Times comes out in support of using pesticides and chemicals in schools by urging the defeat of the
Healthy Schools Bill - AB1207
(It is also disclosed that the LA Times has a financial interest in the use of pesticides.)

 


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
        Urgent - Do what is right for our children!

Dear parent or child advocate:

Friday, August 27th, the LA Times wrote a commentary criticizing  the  "Healthy Schools Bill - AB1207".  I am surprised that  they would come out against a bill which supports the rights of children.  This past Monday, Aug.  23rd, representatives from Community & Children's Advocates Against Pesticide  Poisoning (CCAAPP) attended a rally in Sacramento to support AB1207.  CCAAPP  is a member of Californian's for Pesticide Reform (CPR) and went to  Sacramento to support this bill by attending this rally and also to talk to  legislators about this bill.

CCAAPP supports AB1207 because it would protect our children from  environmental hazards in schools.  The bill would prohibit the use of  cancer-causing and other highly toxic pesticides in schools.  Our children  deserve the alternatives which are available for the pests which would appear  in our schools.  It would also give notification to parents, teachers and  students when pesticides are used (To know when we are being exposed, isn't  that a right we should all have?).  It would require testing for lead and  radon in schools.  The bill would also provide schools with training and  materials necessary to attain minimum environmental health standards.  It  would require the state to assess the risks of portable classrooms and  develop standards as needed.

It is very interesting that the LA Times would come out against this bill.   All of the major medical groups support AB1207 (partial list) - American  Academy of Pediatrics, California Dist. IX, American Lung Assoc. of  California, California Academy of Family Physicians, National Brain Tumor  Foundation, California Nurses Association, California School Nurses  Association.   Other groups are also in support of this bill (partial list) -  California State PTA, California Teacher's Association, California School  Employee's Association, Children's Advocacy Institute, Children's Health  Environmental Coalition.  The opposition groups are (partial list) The  Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Association, Western Crop Association and  the Farm Bureau.  I guess it makes sense that the Chemical Manufacturers  would be against losing some of it's profits if schools stopped using their  pesticides, but, what does farming have to do with schools??? It is my understanding that the LA Times owns much of the farmland in  Southern California, so I imagine it makes sense that they are trying to  protect their "pesticide" interests.  My question to the LA Times and anyone  opposing this bill:  Aren't our children's health and well being the most  important issue for our future??

 Please write a letter to the editor of the LA Times letting them know how  disappointed you are with their politicking.  If this makes you angry enough  you may even want to cancel your subscription and let them know why!!  Click here to send an email to the LA Times and let them know what you think:  letters@latimes.com

To read the article:  http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/COMMENT/t000076501.html Cleaning Up Toxic Classrooms

Sincerely,
Lynda Uvari
Board of Directors
Community & Children's Advocates
Against Pesticide Poisoning
P O Box 5388
Ventura,  CA  93005-0388
805/654-4186


[Symptoms of Pesticide Poisoning] * [Children and Toxic Chemicals]
[California Toxic Hot Spots]
[Newsrelease Site Map]