EPA
modifies pamphlet on pesticides
New York Times News Service (1/99)
Washington
Under pressure from the food industry, the Environmental
Protection Agency has modified a new brochure about pesticides, putting
less emphasis on their health risks and barely mentioning organic foods
as an alternative to foods grown using toxic chemicals.
The brochure, to be distributed to grocery stores
under a food safety law that Congress passed unanimously in 1996, was first
drafted about a year ago.
Only a few pages long, it nonetheless was hotly
debated. Food industry groups called it unduly alarmist; environmental
and consumer advocacy groups complained that it did not refer to pesticides
as poisons.
In August, seven food, farm and pesticide industry
groups called on the Clinton administration to eliminate any references
to organic foods and to make other changes.
The final version of the pamphlet does not completely
ignore organic foods. It advises that "your grocer may be able to
provide you with information about the availability of food grown using
fewer or no pesticides."
But that wording is a concession to industry groups,
which had complained about an earlier version. That version offered
tips of washing, peeling and cooking food to reduce pesticides, then added,
"If you are still concerned, consider buying food that says, 'certified
organic' - food certified by a public or private certification agency that
has been grown in an areas where fewer or no man-made chemical pesticides
were used."
A final draft of the pamphlet was provided to the
New York Times by Consumers Union, an advocacy group that published the
magazine Consumer Reports. The consumer group has long criticized
the environmental agency for not writing a tougher pamphlet to begin with.
"Fundamentally, EPA took what could have been a
really good brochure and turned it into a propaganda piece for the food
industry, which has always denied that there is a problem with pesticides
on food," said Jeannine Kenney, a policy analyst in the group's Washington
office who said she obtained the pamphlet from a government official.
Agency officials confirmed that the revised brochure
was being printed and said it should be in stores this month, five months
after the deadline set by the law.
"We had very exhaustive consultations," said Loretta
Ucelli, a spokeswoman for the agency, "and I think there are and have been
concerns about giving consumers the information they need, but not causing
alarm or indicating that food that is not organic is not safe.
"We believe that we have arrived at aggressive but
consumer-friendly language that will give people the information that they
need to make their own choices."
Gene Grabowski, a spokesman for the Grocery Manufacturers
of America, said the group continued to oppose the reworded pamphlet.
"Even with the change in the language, it still
promotes organic foods in a brochure that was supposed to be about pesticides,"
Grabowski said.